

Sofia Vergara and Nick Loeb in Washington, DC at the pre-party for the White House Correspondents Dinner, 2014 (By Yahoo [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons)
In documents filed Wednesday in opposition to Loeb’s motion to dismiss her lawsuit, Vergara says in a sworn statement that she and her ex-beau reached an agreement in November 2013 concerning the pre-embryos that she believes he has broken.
“When we signed that contract, I understood that we were both agreeing that neither of us could unilaterally act to use or obtain full custody … without the express consent of the other,” the Colombian-born Vergara says.
Vergara’s suit was filed Feb. 14 in Los Angeles Superior Court. Vergara wants the 42-year-old Loeb stopped from using the frozen pre-embryos that they created at the ART Reproductive Center in Beverly Hills unless he first obtains her permission.
Vergara, 45, seeks a court order declaring that any attempts by Loeb to bring the pre-embryos to term is a breach of their original contract.
Vergara says she and Loeb were romantically involved from January 2010 until May 2014. She says that in February 2013, she agreed to IVF treatments so they could have children together, even though she had one son from a previous relationship and “did not feel strongly about having more children.”
The first attempt to have children failed when the surrogate mother, a friend of Vergara’s, did not get pregnant, she says. She said she underwent a second round of treatments in November 2013 that resulted in two viable pre- embryos, but their relationship ended shortly after that “on very hostile terms,” she said.
After Vergara and Loeb broke up, Loeb asked if he could have full custody of the pre-embryos, according to Vergara.
“However, I did not want Nick to be able to bring them to term without my involvement, so I refused,” she said.
Vergara says she believes that a lawsuit Loeb subsequently filed against her was an attempt to “embarrass and harass me publicly about this very private and sensitive issue.”
Loeb dropped the lawsuit last December.
Vergara further says she was “devastated” to learn Loeb established a trust last November that refers to the pre-embryos as Loeb’s “children,” calling it a “clear indication that he believes he has the right to use the pre-embryos unilaterally.”
Vergara would not have agreed to the IVF treatments with Loeb had she known he did not intend to keep his promises, she says.
“I now believe that Nick never intended to abide by the obligations in the contract,” she says.
But in their court papers, Loeb’s lawyers want a judge to dismiss Vergara’s causes of action for declaratory relief, injunctive relief, breach of contract, fraud and that she relied to her detriment on his promises. The lawyers state that the claims are barred on technical grounds under what is known as the Code of Civil Procedure’s compulsory cross-claims statute, meaning she should have brought those allegations in the previous lawsuit Loeb filed against her.
“The purpose of this law is to prevent piecemeal litigation,” Loeb’s attorneys state in their court papers. Loeb’s claims in his lawsuit and those of Vergara in her complaint are “nearly identical,” the suit states.
Some of the claims also are barred by a privilege that allows Loeb to take certain actions in the pursuit of litigation, according to his lawyers’ court papers.
Vergara has an adult son, Manolo. She married actor Joe Manganiello in November 2015.
A hearing on Loeb’s dismissal motion is scheduled Sept. 26.
–City News Service
>> Want to read more stories like this? Get our Free Daily Newsletters Here!