Quantcast
Channel: lawsuit Archives - MyNewsLA.com
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1655

Michael Jackson’s dead, but is his company guilty of financial elder abuse? Quincy Jones lawsuit

$
0
0
Quincy Jones. Photo by Canadian Film Centre from Toronto, Canada (Quincy Jones and the Slaight Family Music Lab) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b
Quincy Jones. Photo by Canadian Film Centre from Toronto, Canada (Quincy Jones and the Slaight Family Music Lab) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b

Quincy Jones. Photo by Canadian Film Centre from Toronto, Canada (Quincy Jones and the Slaight Family Music Lab) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b

Despite a judge’s decision, Grammy-winning record producer Quincy Jones isn’t giving up on his effort to add financial elder abuse to his multimillion-dollar breach-of-contract lawsuit against one of Michael Jackson’s companies.

The lawsuit is over projects released after the singer died, and even though the judge ruled it’s too late to add the new idea of financial elder abuse to the legal action, Jones’ attorneys said Tuesday they believe they can make their case for financial elder abuse in the existing complaint without having to add anything to the case.

On Monday, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Stern said the case is more than three years old and that attorneys for the 83-year-old producer could have brought their proposed new cause of action for financial elder abuse against MJJ Productions much sooner.

The judge also said Jones’ lawyers cannot add four more parties into the case as defendants, including John Branca, a former Jackson attorney who currently serves as co-executor of the singer’s estate.

But Jones’ attorney, Robert Allen, said the ruling does not prevent Jones’ side from telling a jury that Jones was the victim of financial elder abuse.

“We believe we can still make the financial elder abuse claim against MJJP at trial based on the current complaint,” Allen said.

Allen said the judge also ruled that Jones’ expert on damages can testify about his analysis of Jones’ damages and his conclusion they were increased from $22 million to $33 million.

The complaint, filed in October 2013, alleges two causes of action for breach of contract against MJJ productions and one cause of action for an accounting of royalties owed against Sony Music Entertainment.

Jones’ lawyers maintained that they could not bring the elder abuse allegation and the new parties into the case sooner because they only recently learned important new facts, including that royalties from the “This is It” film allegedly were disguised as profits and diverted to three Jackson estate entities: the Michael Jackson Co., MJJ Ventures and Triumph International. Those three entities were also proposed new defendants.

But Stern said he agreed with defense attorneys that revising the case at this stage would be prejudicial to their clients and force the lawyers to file a flurry of new motions. The judge also said he did not want to jeopardize the chance Jones’ case can go to trial ahead of other lawsuits because of the plaintiff’s age.

“This is It” is a 2009 documentary that traces Jackson’s rehearsals and preparation for a series of London concerts that never happened. The singer died on June 25, 2009 — 18 days prior to the tour’s start date — of a drug overdose at age 50.

Another Jones attorney, J. Michael Henningan, said after the hearing that despite the ruling, he believes his client can still seek punitive damages. But MJJ Productions attorney Jonathan Steinsapir said he thinks Jones is now barred from asking for such compensation.

Jones alleges that master recordings he worked on were wrongfully edited and remixed so as to deprive him of bonus profits. The 28-time Grammy winner also maintains he was denied credit for his work on the singer’s works released after his death.

Jones made agreements with Jackson in 1978 and 1985 for work on the singer’s solo albums in which the producer claims he was given the first opportunity to re-edit or remix any of the master recordings. He also maintains that the coupling of master recordings with other recordings required his permission and that was to be given producer credit for each of the master recordings.

— City News Service

>> Want to read more stories like this? Get our Free Daily Newsletters Here!


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1655

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>